Affichage des articles dont le libellé est future. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est future. Afficher tous les articles

24 janvier 2008

La tyrannie de la transparence sur le web

Un petit film que m'a révélé Hugues Rey, ce 23 janvier lors de sa conférence à la BMMA. Le 13/9, 11000 personnes ont vu le film. La société Kryptonite ne jugeait pas opportun de réagir. Le 17, un journaliste fait un papier sur le sujet dans le New York Times, quelques jours après, 1 800 000 personnes ont vu le film. Au bout du compte cela a coûté plus de 10 millions de dollars à Kryptonite. Merci Hugues, pour ce bel exemple de tyrannie de la transparence à laquelle tout entrepreneur doit faire face. Elle peut émaner de n'importe quel stakeholder, un client, un employé, un distributeur, un fournisseur et même un concurrent.

D'où l'importance pour les entreprises de devenir des obsédés de création de valeur d'usage supérieure pour tous les stakeholders, un concept qui est au centre de mon livre.

18 novembre 2007

Le droit à la déconnexion

C'est dans un article de Jean-Marc Manach que j'ai découvert cela. Pour l'instant, vous ne le trouverez qu'en asie et aux USA mais le modèle européen sort ce mois ci. Sous la forme dun porte-clé, cette commande à distance n'a qu'une fonction, elle permet d'éteindre les téléviseurs où qu'ils soient, dans votre salon ou à un salon professionnel, dans un vitrine ou dans un centre commercial. Le brouilleur de téléphone existe aussi pour ceux qui en ontmare d'^tre dérangé par les accrocs du mobile au restaurant, au spectacle, en réunion. Bref à l'époque où les objets équipés de RFID, les puces de radio identification placés sur les objets pour les suivre afin d'améliorer leur usage et nous suivre en même temps, il y aurait une tendance de fond qui s'amorce en faveur d'une connexion plus modérée. Le 12 octobre de cette année, 150 ingénieurs d'un groupe de développement chez Intel, ont instauré le "zero e-mail friday". Ils reprennent le télephone et les rencontre en face à face entre eux. Le management a malgré tout autorisé l'usage des e-mails pour communiquer avec l'extérieur. Ils ne sont pas les seuls. Cela peut paraître anecdotique mais le "Friday-Casual" a aussi commencé petit. Les goupes Levi'strauss et Procter&Gamble avait intérêt à le promouvoir et ne s'en sont pas privé. Qui prendra le relais pour promouvoir la communication en face à face ? L'homme politique ?
La toile est un outil fabuleux mais qui secrète ses propres dangers, le principal étant l'absence de médiation. Une résistance, désorganisée s'installe.
Patrick Willemarck.

17 octobre 2006

Shopping in Tokyo, shopping du futur ?

L'exposition "shopping in Tokyo" de Jean-Jacques et Brigitte Evrard en est à sa quatrième édition, je crois. Quand on aime, on ne compte pas. Leur amour pour le Japon peut sembler exagéré à certains et fortement biaisé par leur métier de designers pour d'autres. Peut-être. Je suis moins sceptique. Un auteur de science fiction pourra-t-il être plus convaincant ? Je n'en suis pas sûr mais je vous invite à méditer ce qu'il écrivait dans les pages de l'Observer. Pour lui, le Japon est la source d'inspiration de toute une vie. Notre Amélie Nothomb nationale et ses "Stupeurs et tremblements" prouve qu'il n'est pas le seul. La famille Evrard (sur la photo) et leur agence dga, également. William Gibson, l'auteur canadien en question considère qu'il n'y a pas de pays qui soit aussi proche de l'avenir. Jean-Jacques Evrard le confirmait lors de la visite guidée de son expo. C'est fascinant. Les entreprises devraient envoyer leurs responsables marketing faire un store-check annuel au pays du soleil levant. Une idée que la BMMA et l'UBA devraient peut-être envisager conjointement. Il faut que j'en parle aux Evrard. En attendant, découvrez la prose séduisante de William Gibson dans son article qui date de 2001, sans rien perdre de sa pertinence. Je le reproduis, en anglais dans le texte, ci-dessous. Depuis 20 ans, le Japon forme le cadre de la pulpart des fictions de cet auteur australien. Quand on lui demande pourquoi, la réponse est cinglante: le Japon est la mise en scène par défaut de l'imagination du futur de notre globe.

"Because Japan is the global imagination's default setting for the future.

The Japanese seem to the rest of us to live several measurable clicks down the time line. The Japanese are the ultimate Early Adaptors, and the sort of fiction I write behoves me to pay serious heed to that. If you believe, as I do, that all cultural change is essentially technologically driven, you pay attention to the Japanese. They've been doing it for more than a century now, and they really do have a head start on the rest of us, if only in terms of what we used to call 'future shock' (but which is now simply the one constant in all our lives).

Consider the Mobile Girl, that ubiquitous feature of contemporary Tokyo street life: a schoolgirl busily, constantly messaging on her mobile phone (which she never uses for voice communication if she can avoid it). The Mobile Girl can convert pad strokes to kanji faster than should be humanly possible, and rates her standing in her cellular community according to the amount of numbers in her phone's memory. What is it that the Mobile Girls are so busily conveying to one another? Probably not much at all: the equivalent of a schoolgirl's note, passed behind the teacher's back. Content is not the issue here, but rather the speed, the weird unconscious surety, with which the schoolgirls of Tokyo took up a secondary feature (text messaging) of a new version of the cellular telephone, and generated, almost overnight, a micro-culture.

A little over 100 years ago, the equivalent personal, portable techno-marvel in Tokyo would have been a mechanical watch. The printmakers of the Meiji period made a very large watch the satiric symbol of the Westernised dandy, and for the Japanese, clock-time was an entirely new continuum, a new reality.

The techno-cultural suppleness that gives us Mobile Girls today, is the result of a traumatic and ongoing temporal dislocation that began when the Japanese, emerging in the 1860s from a very long period of deep cultural isolation, sent a posse of bright young noblemen off to England. These young men returned bearing word of an alien technological culture they must have found as marvellous, as disconcerting, as we might find the products of reverse-engineered Roswell space junk. These Modern Boys, as the techno-cult they spawned came popularly to be known, somehow induced the nation of Japan to swallow whole the entirety of the Industrial Revolution. The resulting spasms were violent, painful, and probably inconceivably disorienting. The Japanese bought the entire train-set: clock-time, steam railroads, electric telegraphy, Western medical advances. Set it all up and yanked the lever to full on. Went mad. Hallucinated. Babbled wildly. Ran in circles. Were destroyed. Were reborn.

Were reborn, in fact, as the first industrialised nation in Asia. Which got them, not too many decades later, into empire-building expansionist mode, which eventually got them two of their larger cities vaporised, blown away by an enemy wielding a technology that might as well have come from a distant galaxy.

And then that enemy, their conquerors, the Americans, turned up in person, smilingly intent on an astonishingly ambitious programme of cultural re-engineering. The Americans, bent on restructuring the national psyche from the roots up, inadvertently plunged the Japanese several clicks further along the time line. And then left, their grand project hanging fire, and went off to fight Communism instead.

The result of this stupendous triple-whammy (catastrophic industrialisation, the war, the American occupation) is the Japan that delights, disturbs and fascinates us today: a mirror world, an alien planet we can actually do business with, a future.

But had this happened to any other Asian country, I doubt the result would have been the same. Japanese culture is 'coded', in some wonderfully peculiar way that finds its nearest equivalent, I think, in English culture. And that is why the Japanese are subject to various kinds of Anglophilia, and vice versa. It accounts for the totemic significance, to the Japanese, of Burberry plaid, and for the number of Paul Smith outlets in Japan, and for much else besides. Both nations display a sort of fractal coherence of sign and symbol, all the way down into the weave of history. And Tokyo is very nearly, in its own way, as 'echoic' (to borrow Peter Ackroyd's term) a city as London.(...)

But we don't reflect them back. We don't have any equivalent of the robot sushi bar in Harvey Nichols, which is as perfectly 'Japanese' a thing as I've seen anywhere, and which probably wouldn't look nearly as cool if it had been built in Tokyo or Osaka.

We don't have branches of Muji interspersed between our Starbucks (although I wish we did, because I'm running out of their excellent toothpaste). Muji is the perfect example of the sort of thing I'm thinking of, because it calls up a wonderful Japan that doesn't really exist. A Japan of the mind, where even toenail-clippers and plastic coat-hangers possess a Zen purity: functional, minimal, reasonably priced. I would very much like to visit the Japan that Muji evokes. I would vacation there and attain a new serenity, smooth and translucent, in perfect counterpoint to natural fabrics and unbleached cardboard. My toiletries would pretend to be nothing more than what they are, and neither would I. (If Mujiland exists anywhere, it's probably not in Japan. If anywhere, it may actually be here, in London.)

Because we don't reflect them back, in Vancouver, they don't market to us in the same way they market to you. (...)

The Japanese are great appreciators of what they call 'secret brands', and in this too they share something with the British. There is a similar fascination with detail, with cataloguing, with distinguishing one thing from another. Both cultures are singularly adroit at re-conceptualising foreign product, at absorbing it and making it their own.

Why Japan, then? Because they live in the future, but neither yours nor mine, and somehow make it seem either interesting or comical or really interestingly dreadful. Because they are capable of naming an après-sport drink Your Water. Because they build museum-grade reproductions of the MA-1 flight jacket that require prospective owners to be on waiting lists for several years before one even has a chance of possibly, one day, owning the jacket. Because they can say to you, with absolute seriousness, believing that it means something, 'I like your lifestyle!'

Because they are Japanese, and you are British, and I am American (or possibly Canadian, by this point).

And I like both your lifestyles.


Enjoy one another!"

Voilà ce que nous racontait William Gibson dans les colonnes de l'observer du 1er Avril 2001.

(c)Patrick Willemarck



Welcome on Patrick Willemarck's blog

I'm the founder of Dialog Solutions.
On this blog I want to share views and opinions about business and more specifically about Brands, Consumers, Marketing, market research, innovation, loyalty, etc., all those business aspects that are deeply affected by social media.
Every company shouldn't be present on every social media network. but every company is becoming porous to the outside world and has therefore to become both social and media.

Patrick