Jeremy Owyang from Altimeter shared an interesting
observation by diffrentiating three types of companies. Here is his post: http://bit.ly/rdB7Jp
I'd like to add an evolutionary perspective to his
observation based on my experience of brand management.
The three kinds of companies he describes are based on perceptions and are also the three stages of development of a strong brand. There is an evolution behind what Jeremy observes.
The 3 stages are the following:
- Legitimacy: new comers entering a market have to be perceived as different but of quality. They won't be considered by consumers if they can't deliver the generic benefit of the category with a very different approach. iTunes did deliver music in a very diffrent way.
- Proximity: once considered by a few people, the brand has to decide how it wants to grow. Two options mass or niche market while still being different. In both case it has to attract the right prospects by building bridges ( relevancy, shared values and purpose) with them.
- Leadership: if it does well the brand will grow further and lead the market. The penalty of leadership is that it still will have to stay relevant there where most leaders rely on their laurels.
The three stages are also closely linked to awareness
levels. And that's where social media bring some big changes in the way brands
are managed. Let me explain.
In the past there was and still is a close and positive
correlation between a brand's position in the market and its spontaneous awareness. The
more brands are spontaneously known the higher their position in their market.
The most known brands are #1 in their market and the second are second
and so on. There are exceptions but only a few. I've reviewed more than 30
categories.
Today I'm absolutely convinced that share of market will
correlate with share of conversations. The most talked about brands, the
most engaging and collaborative ones will lead their market because that's how
they get into the mind of people. Spontaneous awereness reflects how improtant
and relevant a brand is to an individual otherwise he would just skip it from
his memory.The likes, the followers, Klout scores are indications which are
worthwile watching but they cannot help building a brand.
At every stage, social media are offering brand managers
tools which other brands didn't have in the past. Let's look again at the
diferent stages:
- Legitimacy : private and secured panels allow you to digg into what would make your brand relevant and you can do it in a colaborative way by involving prospects and or customers. Once involved, they will attract their peers and be committed to the promotion of a brand which did involve them in its launch.
- Proximity: based on the former step, social media allows you to know with whom and how to engage and expand your brand's fans rather than your page's fans.
- At the leadership stage, social media allows you to show the way and attract custmers and prospects into new thematic experiences our forums.
We, at Dialog
Solutions , have developped tools, softwares and services which
help achieving this by collecting deep insights and motivations, by engaging
with best prospects and customers and the by amplifying what they think and
endorse.
Each step is made easier but also tougher. Because
brand awareness is not the only objective. In social media, the consumer is
central and a strong brand equity won't make it. Because of social media,
success and strong brands require:
- A strong brand equity : see above
- A strong value equity : how valuable is your brand, product and company for the consumer and the society he lives in ? How much do you derserve him? Transactions, contests, price cuts are not the only transactions they're looking for. Many survey show that this is what consumer expect on facebook but that's mainly because they haven't been offered anything else. Try co-creation, involvment, emotional transactions. Value will be a function of your product's ability to deliver and you ability to engage.
- A strong experience equity : a brand has to put its acts together by offering experiences which strengthen and endorse their value proposition.
As a summary and food for thought I think brand managers and
marketers have to stop thinking in terms of Unique Selling Proposition.
Because products are not sold any longer, they're bought.
But also because the social media will force companies to think in terms
of Unique Brand Behaviour or Unique Social Purpose.
What do you think?
Patrick Willemarck
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire